Numbers make the trade-off obvious in a way that principles do not. Take a borrower owing R48 000 across a credit card and two store accounts at a blended rate of about 24% a year, currently paying roughly R2 145 a month and on course to clear the balances in about 30 months. Carrying on as they are, they will repay in the region of R64 300.
The same debt at a better rate
Consolidating that R48 000 into one loan at 16% over the same 30 months drops the instalment to about R1 950 and the repayments to roughly R58 600. Add the initiation fee of up to about R1 207.50 and 30 months of service fees at up to about R69, and the all-in cost lands near R61 900 - close to R2 400 better off, with one debit order instead of three.
The same loan stretched out
Now take the identical loan, at the identical 16%, over 60 months instead. The instalment falls to about R1 165, which feels like a much bigger win. The total repaid climbs to roughly R70 000, and with fees the borrower ends up paying around R75 400 - more than R11 000 worse off than doing nothing, despite the lower interest rate. Same debt, same rate, opposite outcome.
When consolidation is not the answer
These are simplified illustrations rather than quotations, but the pattern holds in every real case. If your debts are small enough to clear within a few months, the initiation fee will swallow the benefit. If your credit record is weak, the rate you are offered may be no better than what you already pay. And if you are already in arrears, a registered debt counsellor is a more realistic starting point than another credit application.